GOP, Lobbyists Mount Criticism of Bill to Overhaul Student Loans

The Democratic-led House of Representatives, in achallenging this much-publicized “$87 billion in
253 to 171 vote on September 17, easily passedsavings” figure. In a piece for The Hill,
landmark legislation that would bring an end to theRepresentative John Kline from Minnesota, ranking
long-standing Federal Family Education Loan ProgramRepublican on the Education and Labor Committee,
(FFELP), the program initiated by the Higher Educationargued that the projected $87 billion in savings
Act of 1965 to offer college students federallyignores long-term, standard risks, failing to allow for
guaranteed student loans via private lenders.interest-rate fluctuations and default risks on college
As the measure awaits a Senate vote scheduled forloans.
October 15, representatives for the FFELP studentThe purported savings, holds Kline, “are in large
loan industry along with prominent Republicans havemeasure actually new earnings the federal
been stepping up their attack on the key mandatesgovernment will take in from student loan borrowers
of the bill, which they say will not only cost studentspaying the government a higher interest rate than
and schools the competitive pricing and choices inthe government’s cost of funds”
student loans offered by the private sector but will(“Student Lending Faces Government
saddle taxpayers with billions of dollars in new costs.Takeover,” TheHill.com, Sept. 14, 2009).
Federal Student Loans: FFELP vs. Direct LoansSince borrowers’ interest rates on federal parent
Under the existing FFEL program, the governmentand student loans are fixed, as market interest rates
pays private FFELP lenders a subsidy for the federalrise from their current recession lows, the
student loans these lenders originate — ingovernment’s cost to fund direct student loans
essence, paying a third party to act as a middlemanwill rise while earned borrower interest remains the
in issuing government student loans.same — meaning that the projected savings
In 1992, the Clinton administration launched a second(that is, in Kline’s view, “earnings”) will
federal student loan program — the Federalshrink.
Direct Student Loan Program — which issuesThe anticipated cash flows to the government on
federal college loans directly to borrowers throughwhich the savings figure is based will also be much
the U.S. Department of Education, with no third-partymore constricted if defaults are higher than
involvement from a bank or other FFELP lender.projected — and default rates in the Federal
Should the House-approved bill, known as theDirect Student Loan Program will surge, say critics.
Student Aid and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2009FFELP lenders have traditionally serviced a higher
(SAFRA), pass the Senate and become law, the FFELpercentage of community college and career college
program will be dismantled and all federal studentstudents than the Direct Loan Program. These
loans will become Federal Direct loans, made directlystudents tend toward higher default rates on their
through the federal government rather than throughcollege loans, regardless of whether they are FFELP
third-party FFELP lenders and banks.or Federal Direct borrowers. As the Education
Supporters of the legislation say that the eliminationDepartment takes on more borrowers from
of FFELP subsidies will generate $87 billion in savingscommunity and career colleges, the argument goes,
to taxpayers over the next decade. The bill allocatesthe Direct Loan Program will also be absorbing these
$80 billion of this estimated savings to expand theborrowers’ higher tendency to default on their
federal Pell Grant program for low-income collegestudent loans, which would eat into the projected
students and to fund several other education$87 billion.
initiatives at what supporters say is no additional costAdditionally, Kline notes that the SAFRA bill only
to taxpayers.covers the cost of some of its proposed education
President Obama has been a vocal backer of the bill,spending for five years, after which taxpayers will be
maintaining that FFELP subsidies funnel governmentfacing either program cuts or increased taxes in
money to banks and away from students.order to continue funding these new and expanded
“Ending this unwarranted subsidy for big banks iseducation initiatives. Moreover, Kline revealed in his
a no-brainer for folks everywhere,” Obama saidpiece for The Hill, the nonpartisan Congressional
in a recent speech at Hudson Valley CommunityBudget Office has recently acknowledged that the
College in New York.proposed Pell Grant expansion will actually cost
Critics: Talk of Student Loan “Savings”$11.4 billion more than originally projected — an
Ignores Obvious Costsamount that isn’t covered by the current
Critics of the SAFRA measure, however, are$80 billion allocation within the student loan bill.